|
On the Street Where You Never Lived:
The Fallacy of the Quickie Divorce
by:
Victoria Bender
Often
times when a decision to divorce is made, a party
wants the matter settled immediately. However, in
North Carolina, one of the parties must be a
resident of North Carolina for a minimum of six
months directly preceding the filing of the action,
AND the parties must be separated for one year. (NCGS
50-6) Separation begins when the parties live
separate and apart and at least one of the parties
has the intent of not continuing the marital
relationship. Because of this one year minimum time,
many people consider “quickie” foreign divorces.
A
divorce which is valid in the state in which it is
granted, is valid in North Carolina under the full
faith and credit clause of the United States
Constitution. However, a divorce may be attacked if
the court was without the jurisdiction to enter the
judgment. Jurisdiction is the power of the court to
enter an order regarding a certain matter for the
parties standing before it. The court must have BOTH
the power to adjudicate the type of matter (ie
divorce), known as subject matter jurisdiction, AND
the power to adjudicate the matter for these
particular parties, known as personal jurisdiction.
In North
Carolina the only ground for divorce, other than
incurable insanity, is one year separation. In other
states the grounds range from irreconcilable
differences, to separation for a period of months or
years, to fault grounds for which immediate relief
may be granted. Since many states and foreign
countries allow immediate divorce for many reasons,
people consider traveling to the other jurisdiction
to obtain a divorce and then return with the proper
judgment in tow to North Carolina. In most cases
such a judgment is void because there was not
personal jurisdiction over the parties. The court
had the power to grant divorces to its citizens, but
that power did not reach to persons who were “just
visiting.”
The
amount of time a party must reside in a state before
the court will allow him/her to have the matter
heard differs from state to state, the shortest time
(no statutory provision), is in Alaska and
Washington; and the longest time (12 months) is in
eleven states. Nevada, once considered the divorce
capital of the United States requires 60 days of
residence. The type of residence referred to in the
divorce statutes is what is usually called “domicile.”
While people can have more than one residence, a
person can have only one domicile. In a case
regarding residence for voting, the Supreme Court of
North Carolina has held that, “ ...a person has
domicile ...at a place if he (1) has abandoned his
prior home (2) has a present intention to make that
place his home, and (3) has no intention presently
to leave that place.” Lloyd v Babb, 296 N.C.
416, 251 SE2d 843 (1979) In order for a
party to be able to go to a different state or
country to file for divorce, that person would have
to establish domicile in the new state. For example,
if an adult leaves home to take a temporary
assignment in another state, but always intends to
return to his home, the domicile remains the state
where the permanent home is. If, on the other hand,
the person leaves home to take a new job and never
intends to return to the original home, the location
of his new home is the new domicile. In a divorce
situation, a party would have to actually move to a
new place without the intent to return to the prior
place.
A second
plan parties have in order to hasten a divorce is to
go to another country. The North Carolina Supreme
Court, as well as the courts of most other states,
do not recognize the validity of foreign divorces by
US citizens who are not permanently residing in the
foreign country. “The full faith and credit clause has
no application to foreign judgments. Recognition of
foreign decrees by a State of the Union is governed
by principles of comity. Consequently, based on
notions of sovereignty, comity can be applied
without regard to a foreign country's jurisdictional
basis for entering a judgment. More often than not,
however, "many of the American states are
likely to refuse recognition [to deny comity] to a
divorce decree of a foreign country not founded
on" a sufficient jurisdictional basis. 1 R.
Lee, North Carolina Family Law§ 104, at 488 (4th
ed. 1979). ....Since the power of a State of the
Union to grant a divorce decree is dependent upon
the existence of a sufficient jurisdictional
basis--domicile or such a relationship between the
parties of the State as would make it reasonable for
the State to dissolve the marriage--it follows that
the validity of a foreign divorce decree should
depend upon an adequate jurisdictional basis.
....The great weight of authority in this country is
that divorces granted in foreign countries to
persons who are domiciliaries of the United States
are not valid and enforceable. See Annot., 13
A.L.R.3d 1419 (1967).”Mayer v Mayer 66
N.C.App. 522, 311 S.E.2d 659.
The
Mayer case is instructional in other ways as well.
Mr. Mayer helped his wife obtain a divorce from her
first husband. He encouraged her and financed the
trip to the Dominican Republic. When the Mayers
separated, Mr. Mayer tried to claim that his
marriage to Doris was bigamous because her Dominican
Republic divorce was invalid. The court agreed with
Mr. Mayer that the divorce was invalid, but then
held that because he had actively participated in
helping Mrs. Mayer obtain the divorce, he could not
now assert its invalidity.
If you
have obtained a divorce in a foreign country,
contact an attorney at once to determine the
validity of that divorce. You may need to file for
divorce in the state of your present residence. If
you have remarried in reliance on a foreign divorce,
see an attorney at once. Since many rights arise
from a marriage, not just rights to distribution of
property on divorce, you need to make certain that
your marriage is valid.
|
|
|
Copyright © 2005 Bender Law Offices P.C., All Rights
Reserved.
Divorce Lawyers, Separation Attorneys, Family Law,
International Divorce, Mediation, Agreements, Child
Custody, Court Services, Alimony, Domestic Violence,
Child Support, Property Distribution, Spousal
Support
|
|